Asked whether he would support the "little guy" in his rulings Judge John Roberts reminded the left what they should really be concentrating on:
I had someone ask me in this process, I don't remember who it was, but somebody asked me, you know, "Are you going to be on the side of the little guy," and you obviously want to give an immediate answer, ( Read more... )

Okay, I'm almost through with Ms. Feinstein, I promise.

Just one more point. Earlier today she said:
For centuries, individuals have been persecuted for their religious beliefs.

During the Roman Empire, the Middle Ages, the Reformation, and even today, millions of innocent people have been killed or tortured because of their religion.
I would ( Read more... )

Senator Feinstein evidently thought she was back in the 1940s at the Nuremberg trials (or simply wanted to prove Godwin correct) and started ranting about the Nazis in Hungary.
During World War II, it turned out that Hungarian fascists and Nazi soldiers forced thousands of Jews, including men, women and children, to remove their shoes before ( Read more... )

Two examples of blatant lying from the left.

First, there is (former Enron advisor) Paul Krugman, lying about the results of media studies of the Florida 2000 vote:
Two different news media consortiums reviewed Florida's ballots; both found that a full manual recount would have given the election to Mr. Gore.

Yet the truth is quite the opposite:
( Read more... )

I was about to use the phrase "critics of Judge Roberts", but I realized that they are not really critics of Judge Roberts, but critics of what they think he believes in.

The left has whined for weeks that there is nothing obvious that would give them an excuse to vote against Judge Roberts. Why would they need an excuse? Because they aren't ( Read more... )

NARAL, caught telling lies about Judge Roberts, seemed to be retreating from their untrue allegations.

However, in their statement they vowed to keep repeating the lies contained in the ad:
Keenan's response said the group will replace the ad with one that "examines Mr. Roberts' record on several points, including ...his arguments against using a ( Read more... )

The more hysterical liberals get about Judge Roberts the more I am convinced he is the man for the job, even if only to increase the blood pressure of liberals.

Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) felt the need to lie about Judge Roberts statements in a private meeting.
"I asked whether it was constitutional for Congress to intervene in an end-of-life case ( Read more... )

Good grief, don't the Democrats have any shame?
The NEW YORK TIMES is looking into the adoption records of the children of Supreme Court Nominee John G. Roberts, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned ( Read more... )

Howard Dean is telling fellow Democrats they need to reach out to anti-abortion (or as most of them prefer to be referred to: pro-life) voters.

Hmmm, does that mean he's endorsing Judge Roberts for the Supreme Court?

Judging from the hysterical reaction of the left, President Bush's nomination of John Roberts to be an associate Supreme Court Justice is the end of the world...at least for women ( Read more... )